DIY W Rails
-
@biell Custom shaping will never be Mission. I played with so many settings but the weird surging just does not feel right. Now i just use plain Mission and ride level at pushback;)
The angle as i measure is 4deg. Have no digital gauge, just by hand.
-
@maciak Thanks, I agree, Mission is by far the best shaping. And, thanks for measuring.
I've known something was off for a long time, I stand on my tip-toes on my rear foot when waiting for traffic lights, to even things out. I also can't ride the board backwards b/c it is 3.54° in the other direction from what I am used to. But, I just dealt with it before.
My Plus is fine, but pushback starts so early on that thing, it wasn't that much different. But, now with the GT being level until 19MPH, the 1.77° on my XR is just really annoying and different.
I will try Reddit, and if they are no help, reach out to some Stoke Life people to see if I can fix it so I can go back to Mission. Alternatively, I could redo the repair on my 4208 and swap back down to that one.
-
@biell -- Riding pushback all the time on my Plus I put in a thick board for the back footpad and it helps.
-
@s-leon Actually it does lol. PB on + is a pita
-
@biell You could get a tiltkit or just diy tilt the controller? Needs about 4-5mm. It creates a different set of problems though. The TFL tiltkit killed a bunch of controllers (how is it kept silent?!). I suspect cause of a capacitor getting squeezed into the bottom of the box which i found out during own experimenting. I asked/adviced Jeff. He tactically avoided answering any questions about it.
-
@maciak I am afraid my skills might not be there for that. Also, I would have to tilt the other direction, which might mess up how the connectors line up with the holes in the back of the controller box.
-
@biell Darn, looks like i misunderstood the whole thing! So you want the controller side to point down while in mission?
-
@maciak I actually want the controller to point straight/level in Mission. My controller is messed up a little. When the Onewheel reports at being 0.0°, the front is actually up 1.77°. Essentially, if I am set in my preferred Mission mode, it is like I am riding Elevated. I can fix this with custom shaping by setting the ride angle at -1. When I do this, my board rides level-ish (I think level would be -0.9). But, I prefer Mission.
Originally I thought, what if WTF rails were at a 2° angle? Then, I could put my jacked up controller in them and ride perfectly without having to get the TFL controller lid replacement. But, with WTF rails at more than 4°, that isn't going to work. I would still need custom shaping.
I was also wondering if there was a way of re-calibrating the board, but I doubt there is because then people with WTF rails would have just done that. I also don't know if the issue is in software or hardware.
I had been ignoring this issue for the last couple years because I was used to it, with most of my riding on my XR. However, now I am riding my GT as much, if not more than my XR. So, the raised front became harder to ignore. Right now I am at -1,-1,6 and it feels a bit like Flow on the GT.
If you have any thoughts or ideas, I am definitely interested in suggestions.
-
@biell Maybe not quite what you're after but u/Izzymonster just posted "Titled Controller Box, work in progress. Appreciate any feedback from experienced tilt kilt installers."
https://www.reddit.com/r/onewheel/comments/uh03xd/titled_controller_box_work_in_progress_appreciate/ -
@biell When my board with WTF is level, the app shows -3.7 deg. So assuming WTF are 4.2 deg, it would mean that it would be sitting nose-down by 0.5 deg on straight rails for the app to show 0. When the board is really level, this would be -0.5 in the app.
So your board still deviates 1.27 deg extra..
The pcb is mounted under the lid with 3mm spacers. You could remove (or replace with shorter spacers) the front ones which will not mess too much with the connectors (opposite tilting also puts them at an angle which is no problem).
Edit: see img when i tilted the frontside
Only thing is the thermal pad, and if anything on the underside of pcb gets pinched against the lid.. gotta see if there's any issues there. I think this could work.
Edit: maybe not..there's lotsa stuff in the front that could be pinched against the lid without any spacer. Need to open to really see?!
-
@lia Thanks, depending on how this shapes up, it could be a starting point for me. Either by trying to make the angle less with WTF rails or by flipping it for straight rails. It will also depend on if it is sold as a product or provided as an STL.
-
@maciak Thanks, I thought about that but was worried about the thermal pad. If you learn something there, please let me know. I haven't opened the controller since I decided this was a problem, so I also want to take a look at the board to see if something looks wrong on there, too.
-
-
-
@lia Nice thought about JBWeld, I hadn't thought of that. That would certainly make one part of the mod easier. Thank you.
-
I think I may have an idea, I could get the FAF Varials and flip the center piece's left and right sides. It might just be enough to even everything out and have me ride near level. I might reach out to Jeff to ask about this. If I hear anything back, I will let you know.
-
From reddit (Linky)
TFL have successfully patented their WRail design, can't say I expected that so I wonder if there was a concern that other companies or even FM were planning to make and build their own?Anyway here it is on Google Patents with a few notable drawings from it.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US11325021B1/
@MacIak @biell In the patent (towards the end) are approximate dimensions and angles so that should answer our earlier questions :)
-
@lia Funny, they were granted a patent this month for a product they stopped selling months ago. I wonder if the are going to patent varirails now, I can only assume they plan to. Then, maybe I can look up the specs on the FAF rails.
The tilt is 5° on WTF rails.
-
@biell AFAIK was 3 degrees. They were talking in the tech rails group in facebook
-
@ed_co So it is a bit confusing reading the patent. They clearly state that the footpad section is 3.7° relative to the center section in some parts, but then discuss a net 5° tilt throughout the rest of the narrative. So, if I understand what I am reading (which I may not), then the specific locations of the pivot points come into play, and the net board down-angle is, in fact, 5° when a normal board is registering as level while engaged (in e.g. Mission), but at rest.
